Jabalpur | Jabalpur High Court has granted bail to former Madhya Pradesh minister and senior Congress leader Raja Pateria, arrested for making indecent remarks against Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
Raja Pateria was lodged in Pawai jail for the last two and a half months, his bail plea was rejected many times, while hearing the petition on January 11, the High Court dismissed it. A bench of Justice Sanjay Dwivedi in its order said there was no occasion for the applicant, who is a public leader, to use such derogatory language for the prime minister of the country, but on Monday, the bail petition was heard once again and Raja Patria got relief from the court.
In fact, on December 11 last year, a Congress meeting was held at the rest house in Pawai in Panna district, in which Raja Pateria went to address his party workers, a video of it went viral, in which Raja Pateria can be heard saying in his address Have been saying - “Modi will end the election. Will divide on the basis of caste, religion and language. The future lives of saints, tribals, minorities are in danger. If you want to save the Constitution, be ready to kill Modi, in this sense work to defeat him.
After Raja Pateria's video went viral, BJP leaders started protesting, however, as soon as there was a ruckus, former minister Raja Pateria apologized for his statement the very next day, Pateria clarified that, 'I am a follower of Gandhi and A follower of Gandhi cannot talk about murder, my video is being wrongly propagated, but on the application of BJP leaders, Pabai police station of Panna district registered an FIR against Pateria and arrested him and sent him to judicial custody. given.
When Raja Pateria's lawyers, who were trying for bail after arrest, did not get relief from the local court, they filed a bail petition in the Special MP/MLA Court of Gwalior District Court in December itself, but the court rejected it. He again filed a bail petition in Gwalior ADJ Court, which was rejected by the court on December 22, ADJ Court refused to grant bail, agreeing with the arguments presented by the government advocate.
